Wednesday, 6 July 2011

Shri Krishna as Kali

O daughter of the snow-capped mountain! That Ananga whose bow is of flowers, whose bow string is of a row of bees, who has five arrows, who has as his feudatory Vasanta, and the Malaya breeze as his chariot, he, even though thus equipped, having obtained some grace from thy side glance, conquers all this world single-handed - Saundaryalahari, 6

In places in the tantrik tradition, the Krishna avatar of Vishnu is often identified with Kali. This reaches a peak in the Tantrarajatantra, where it is said that having already charmed the world of men as herself, <span>Lalita</span> took a male form as Krishna and then proceeded to enchant women. In this work, Krishna has six forms, identified with the six senses (including Mind). They are Kamaraja Gopala, Manmatha Gopala, Kandarpa Gopala, Makaraketana Gopala and Manobhava Gopala. Their meditation images (dhyana according to the same work, describes them as being like dawn, with six arms, holding flute, noose, goad, sugar cane bow and a bowl of curds. These are the five arrows of Lalita and the bow and here Krishna is identified with Kameshvara, the Indian god of love, who is otherwise called Ananga, and, like Cupid, is armed with a bow.

The Kalivilasa Tantra, a Bengali work, states Krishna was born as the son of Devi who was golden (Gauri) and turned black when he was excited by passion. In the Todala Tantra, each of the ten Mahavidyas, forms of the supreme Goddess, has her own male counterpart and here Krishna is said to be the spouse of Kali. There are many images of Krishna in India which show him as black. An Indian commentator to the hymn to Kali called Karpuradistotra, goes further and says that there is a connection between the bija mantra of Kali which is Krim, Krishna and Christ. Whatever the truth of that identification, it is certain that to many ordinary folk in India, Krishna and Christ do have a resonance. Often you will see contemporary images of Krishna and Christ together in the inside of houses. Krishna (and his tantrika counterpart Kameshvara) are moved by love (prem).

In the Brihat Tantra Sara, a large compilation of tantrik rites, Krishna appears as a fully-flowered tantrika devata, with his own yantra, gayatri, mantra and puja or ritual which uses this yantra (click on this image for full size yantra). In the hexagon in the centre of the yantra, the following words appear: Krishnaya Govindaya Klim sadhya Gopijanavallabhaya Svaha. In the corners of the hexagon are the bija mantras Hrim and Shrim. Outside the hexagon is the Krisna mantra which runs: Klim Krishnaya Namah. In the petals of the yantra is a longer mantra Namah Kamadevaya Sarvajanapriyaya Sarvajansammohanaya Jvala Prajvala Sarvajanasya Hridayamavamsham Kurukura Svaha. Around the eight petals are the Matrikas or letters of the Sanskrit alphabet while in the angles of the protecting wall are bija mantras Hrim and Shrim, once more.


  1. I need to know if Vishnu and Shiva are aspects of the same Supreme Personality of Godhead Krishna?

    1. There is no supreme personality of Godhead. There is only one soul, the Param-soul, Paramatma, Brahman. Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva are the three attributed manifestations of Brahman for Brahman in 'Itself" attributeless. Brahma is of the creative, generative power (attribute - Rajas), Vishnu is of sustenance power ((attribute - Sattva) and Shiva is of destructive power ((attribute - Tamas).

      This same Brahman is Supreme Personality of Godhead to the Vaishavas as Lord Vishnu and Lord Krishna, Sadashiva to a Shaivaite etc.

      Brahman exists in only two states -- Nish-kriya i.e. non-working and Sakriya i.e. working. Brahman resides in nishkriya state at and after dissolution of total existence called Pralaya. but when Brahman is Sakriya, we know it as Shakti. Shakti is everything. Vishnu, Shiva or no other God, nor any single thing in this universe is but the manifestation of Shakti. Even he who is Shaktiman that is powerful, he is so because he is attributed with Shakti. this is the real truth.

  2. It is shamefull that the author has just copied information of Krushna as kali and then disgustingly added name of CHrist in middle to spread his foolish confusion. If you like Christ read about him, if you like Krushna read about him, why mix the two??? Christ was born in different time, place, religion, culture. He was Hebrew and a human. If author had understood article he would not have done this stupid mix-up 'cause Krushna is not a human!.