tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post3146665736704357285..comments2024-02-27T02:19:27.223-08:00Comments on Mantra & Shlokas: Lord Narasimha and Shiva SarabhaMadhuri Saxenahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16725883564969711892noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-62616305796108012982018-07-26T20:09:59.679-07:002018-07-26T20:09:59.679-07:00without Gayathri upasaana, not try Priyathianara D...without Gayathri upasaana, not try Priyathianara Devi upasana.varathuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10587129301699024897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-27657462056569017012018-07-26T20:08:22.691-07:002018-07-26T20:08:22.691-07:00Adi Sankara only quoted from vishnu puranam even R...Adi Sankara only quoted from vishnu puranam even Ramanuja himself.<br />But, in real life, I seen Sarabha in my dreams. Hence, I concluded sarabha is one of the form of Rudra not related to Narasimha. <br />but, Priyathiangra is wife of sarabha always associated with Gayathri.varathuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10587129301699024897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-38512112921013889082015-01-12T02:27:08.176-08:002015-01-12T02:27:08.176-08:00Its an inauthentic story as none of the forms of K...Its an inauthentic story as none of the forms of Kamala and Hari can be destroyed by anyone...<br />Sarvam Lakshmipati arpanamastuAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08969251990375010254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-29170346555745277472014-12-21T23:15:17.925-08:002014-12-21T23:15:17.925-08:00Kalika Purana's 30th Chapter also mentions dea...Kalika Purana's 30th Chapter also mentions death of Varaha at the hands of Sharabha.Kāmakalā Bhațțācāryahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05018631552947751308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-9129275973485136112014-06-09T05:36:07.804-07:002014-06-09T05:36:07.804-07:00Lord Naraimha's anger subsided when Prahlada f...Lord Naraimha's anger subsided when Prahlada fell down before him with bhakti sraddha and prema. Then the lord once again assumed his anandamaya swabhava. Lord Narasimha's anger was further pacified by Srimati Lakshmi devi,his own shakti who is him only in another form.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08969251990375010254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-12888066213460993052014-06-09T05:27:53.310-07:002014-06-09T05:27:53.310-07:00@Cadambi Nishikanth,
It seems you don't unders...@Cadambi Nishikanth,<br />It seems you don't understand at all. All ancient authorities say this in the Vedas " ekam brahma dvitiyam nasti". There is only one God and not a second. This God is identified in the Mahabharata and Vyasa says that Vishnu alone is that god.<br />" Satyam satyam punassatyam satyam bhujamuchyate, veda shaastrat param nasti nah daivam keshavat param"<br />"This i the truth this is the truth ,I raise my hands in the air and say this truth. There is no scripture superior to the Vedas and there is no God superior to Lord keshava(Vishnu)"<br /><br />There are many such evidences and i could go on and on.<br /><br />The fruit theory that you cited is non existent at all.<br />There is no such thing as formless God, the Vedas just say that god has no form that is made of matter. But the Vedas also state that he is sacchidananda vigraha and his form is anandamaya.<br />I request you to have a look at this website for understanding this fact:<br />http://narayanastra.blogspot.inAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08969251990375010254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-32382048287386126992014-01-29T18:53:27.750-08:002014-01-29T18:53:27.750-08:00you fools dont you ever get the face that each com...you fools dont you ever get the face that each community distorts the story as per their liking. you say this purana and that purana...let people come and provide authenticity..buy and rendition of purana from amazon and claiming authenticity is plain BS....<br /><br />Understand the hidden meaning in the forms...whenever you are angry ..who will calm you down? you have two options<br />1.) you should control yourself( inner aspect..the "I" that defines you)<br />2.) Someone very close to you who you love so much you will never hurt..if you hurt THAT person you will wnd up hurting yourself.<br />Lord narasimha's anger grew out of bounds..how would it subside.<br />he has to control himself..the inner self of vishnu is shiva and vice versa.<br />Thats why lord shiva manifested form of sarabha..srabha is creature which has enormous wings..would narasimha hurt srabha? (point 2) answer is NO..same applies to Sarabha killing narasimha..thats why he took the form so that he can flap the wings and calm him down.<br /><br />Shiva and Vishnu are one . WHy you may ask?<br />Because their inner souls are the same.<br />Apples and oranges cant be compared BUT BOTH OF THEM HAVE ONE THING IN COMMON what? THEY ARE FRUITS.<br />FRUIT is a non physical term without attributes whn attributed it becomes mango pineapple apple orange bana etc.<br />This is the concept which adi shankaracharya and ramana maharshi want HINDUS TO understand..PLZ USE COMMON SENSE..sick of watching hindus delving into petty issues regarding anciet biased texts instead of appreciating teh manifestations of the formless lord.<br />If you still dont get my point , IT's Ok, i will pray so that you achieve higher sense of intellect in your next life atleastAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01171142726863610774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-73275085053443715282013-11-02T06:35:20.733-07:002013-11-02T06:35:20.733-07:00yes .yes .Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09291131300481223380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-43821042260873741802013-09-27T00:15:03.805-07:002013-09-27T00:15:03.805-07:00And Sarabha upanishad is not authentic at all.It i...And Sarabha upanishad is not authentic at all.It is only 300-400 years old and not even mentioned by acharyas like Sankaracharya,Ramanuja and Madhva,nor by acharyas after or before them.It is of a recent day origin.But Narasimha Tapani upanishad of Atharva Veda which is authentic with commentaries as old as Sri Sankaracharya tell that Narasimha is infinite and the supreme Brahman.How can he be killed?Narasimha killed Sarabha as per sattvika puranas like padma purana.Since thi story is against the vedas,itihasa and sattvika puranas,it is entirely bogus and unacceptable.Only Krishna is the Supreme lord.Plus it is according to the yamala samhitas that Narasimha ripped Sarabha into pieces in his form as Ashtamukha Gandabherunda Narasimha and was calmed by Mahalakshmi in her form as Simhalakshmidevi/Pratyangira when she sat on His lap and of course by prahlada and not calmed by Sarabha.May lakshmi narasimha bless all of us!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08969251990375010254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29035178728864256.post-1774203882385337872012-06-22T20:00:07.129-07:002012-06-22T20:00:07.129-07:00As per Skanda purana Veerabadra defeated Narasimha...As per Skanda purana Veerabadra defeated Narasimha. As per Shaivapurana Rudra himself came in as Sharaba and defeated Narasimha. Which is right, whether it is Rudra or Veerabadra? As there is differences between two taamasa puraanaas itself. There is no such evidence from any saatvika purana. How can it be justified? There are many puranaas which says that Nrusimha himself killed Sharabha. They are :<br />As per Padmapurana<br />As per Vamana purana<br />As per Koorma puranaSanathanan Kandayah (Sanat)https://www.blogger.com/profile/12955872131219745249noreply@blogger.com